Weber’s Syndrome

Weber’s Syndrome: A Classic Midbrain Stroke Syndrome of Crossed Neurological Signs

Weber’s syndrome, also called Weber’s paralysis, is a rare but well-characterized midbrain stroke syndrome, typically caused by a lesion affecting the cerebral peduncle and the oculomotor nerve (cranial nerve III). It presents with a unique pattern of ipsilateral cranial nerve III palsy and contralateral hemiparesis, offering a textbook example of crossed (alternating) brainstem signs.


1. Historical Background and Eponym

Sir Hermann David Weber (1823–1918) was a German-born British physician. In 1863, he described a clinical syndrome combining third cranial nerve palsy on one side with motor weakness on the opposite side of the body. This led to the recognition of Weber’s syndrome as a distinct form of ventral midbrain lesion. Beyond neurology, Weber was a pioneer in tuberculosis treatment and a physician to several British prime ministers. He was knighted for his services to medicine in 1899.


2. Anatomy and Pathophysiology

Weber’s syndrome results from a lesion in the ventromedial portion of the midbrain, particularly involving:

  • The oculomotor nerve (CN III) fascicles, which produce ipsilateral third nerve palsy

  • The corticospinal tract fibers in the cerebral peduncle, causing contralateral hemiparesis

Most common causes include:

  • Ischemic stroke, especially involving perforating branches of the posterior cerebral artery (PCA)

  • Hemorrhage, tumor, demyelinating disease, or trauma


3. Clinical Features

Structure Involved

Clinical Manifestation

Oculomotor Nerve (CN III)

Ptosis, diplopia, eye deviated "down and out," fixed dilated pupil

Corticospinal Tract

Weakness or paralysis of the contralateral face, arm, and leg

This crossed pattern—with cranial nerve deficit on one side and motor weakness on the other—is a hallmark of brainstem syndromes.


4. Differential Diagnosis

Weber’s syndrome must be differentiated from other midbrain syndromes with overlapping features:

Syndrome

Location of Lesion

Key Features

Weber’s

Ventromedial midbrain

CN III palsy + contralateral hemiparesis

Benedikt’s

Tegmental midbrain

CN III palsy + contralateral tremor/ataxia

Claude’s

Midbrain tegmentum

CN III palsy + contralateral ataxia (no hemiparesis)


5. Diagnosis

Diagnosis is based on:

  • Clinical neurological examination showing crossed cranial nerve and long tract findings

  • MRI of the brainstem to localize the lesion

  • Vascular imaging (MRA/CTA) to detect PCA branch occlusion or hemorrhage


6. Management and Prognosis

Acute Management

  • Ischemic causes: antiplatelet therapy, thrombolysis or thrombectomy (if indicated)

  • Hemorrhagic or structural causes: neurosurgical evaluation

  • Control of vascular risk factors (hypertension, diabetes, smoking)

Supportive Therapy

  • Physical and occupational therapy to restore strength and coordination

  • Ophthalmologic interventions for ptosis, diplopia, or persistent oculomotor palsy

  • Speech therapy if bulbar involvement occurs

Prognosis

  • Depends on the extent and cause of the lesion

  • Many patients experience partial recovery of cranial nerve III function

  • Motor deficits may improve significantly with early and sustained rehabilitation


7. Summary Table: Weber’s Syndrome Overview

Feature

Description

Named After

Sir Hermann David Weber (1863)

Anatomical Location

Ventromedial midbrain (cerebral peduncle)

Cranial Nerve Involved

CN III – ipsilateral palsy (ptosis, diplopia, pupillary dilation)

Contralateral Signs

Hemiparesis (face, arm, leg) due to corticospinal tract damage

Etiologies

Ischemia (PCA), hemorrhage, demyelination, tumor

Diagnosis

Clinical + MRI + vascular imaging

Treatment

Stroke care + rehabilitation + symptom management

Prognosis

Variable; good outcomes possible with early intervention


8. Conclusion

Weber’s syndrome remains a classic example of brainstem neuroanatomy in action, where clinical signs precisely localize the lesion to the ventral midbrain. Thanks to the early insights of Sir Hermann Weber, this syndrome continues to serve as a valuable teaching tool and diagnostic clue in stroke neurology. Early recognition and intervention can lead to meaningful recovery in many patients.

Comment